<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (9) TMI 1439 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272833</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) decision to allow profit commission paid to the Chairman and Managing Director (CMD) as reasonable and aligned with the company&#039;s needs. However, the Tribunal confirmed the Assessing Officer&#039;s disallowance of guarantee commission paid to directors due to lack of business necessity. The Tribunal remitted the issue of commission paid to John Bruce (UK) Ltd. back to the AO for further examination. Additionally, the Tribunal restored the disallowance of profit commission to the CMD&#039;s daughter and rent paid for accommodation leased from the CMD&#039;s son-in-law, emphasizing lack of justification and business purpose.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 20 May 2018 21:58:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=521003" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (9) TMI 1439 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272833</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) decision to allow profit commission paid to the Chairman and Managing Director (CMD) as reasonable and aligned with the company&#039;s needs. However, the Tribunal confirmed the Assessing Officer&#039;s disallowance of guarantee commission paid to directors due to lack of business necessity. The Tribunal remitted the issue of commission paid to John Bruce (UK) Ltd. back to the AO for further examination. Additionally, the Tribunal restored the disallowance of profit commission to the CMD&#039;s daughter and rent paid for accommodation leased from the CMD&#039;s son-in-law, emphasizing lack of justification and business purpose.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272833</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>