<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (10) TMI 1314 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272837</link>
    <description>A BOT infrastructure concession routed through GSRDC qualified for deduction under section 80IA(4)(i)(b) because the project was part of a Government-approved scheme, the State had allotted land and authorised toll collection, and GSRDC operated as a Government agency under the Gujarat Infrastructure Development Act, 1999. Applying the settled tests for identifying an instrumentality or agency of the State, the arrangement was treated as an agreement with a governmental authority rather than a mere private contract. The statutory conditions for the deduction were therefore satisfied, and the disallowance was held unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Mar 2019 20:16:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=520999" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (10) TMI 1314 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272837</link>
      <description>A BOT infrastructure concession routed through GSRDC qualified for deduction under section 80IA(4)(i)(b) because the project was part of a Government-approved scheme, the State had allotted land and authorised toll collection, and GSRDC operated as a Government agency under the Gujarat Infrastructure Development Act, 1999. Applying the settled tests for identifying an instrumentality or agency of the State, the arrangement was treated as an agreement with a governmental authority rather than a mere private contract. The statutory conditions for the deduction were therefore satisfied, and the disallowance was held unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272837</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>