https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272829 A recital of a relevant fact in a judgment not inter partes is not admissible under Section 35 of the Evidence Act merely because the judgment is a public record. Judgments are governed by the specific provisions on relevancy and admissibility of judgments, namely Sections 40 to 44, and those rules cannot be bypassed by invoking Section 35. Unless such a judgment falls within those special provisions or another specific evidentiary rule, its recital of fact has no admissibility under Section 35 as evidence of the truth of the statement. en-us Thu, 05 Jan 1922 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 19 May 2018 16:49:57 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272829 A recital of a relevant fact in a judgment not inter partes is not admissible under Section 35 of the Evidence Act merely because the judgment is a public record. Judgments are governed by the specific provisions on relevancy and admissibility of judgments, namely Sections 40 to 44, and those rules cannot be bypassed by invoking Section 35. Unless such a judgment falls within those special provisions or another specific evidentiary rule, its recital of fact has no admissibility under Section 35 as evidence of the truth of the statement. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 05 Jan 1922 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272829