<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (5) TMI 1165 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360601</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the ITAT&#039;s decision to delete the Transfer Pricing Adjustment on interest while examining the provisions of section 92C. It also affirmed the deletion of the addition to the Arm&#039;s Length Price for a Corporate Guarantee, ruling it did not involve international transactions. The court supported the claim for weighted deduction for Foreign Trade Marks and Patents under section 35(2AB) and addressed the disallowance of provision for leave encashment under section 43B, proposing further proceedings involving the CIT(A) due to time constraints. The judgment provided a comprehensive analysis of the legal issues, guiding the resolution based on applicable laws and precedents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 May 2018 11:54:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=520965" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (5) TMI 1165 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360601</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the ITAT&#039;s decision to delete the Transfer Pricing Adjustment on interest while examining the provisions of section 92C. It also affirmed the deletion of the addition to the Arm&#039;s Length Price for a Corporate Guarantee, ruling it did not involve international transactions. The court supported the claim for weighted deduction for Foreign Trade Marks and Patents under section 35(2AB) and addressed the disallowance of provision for leave encashment under section 43B, proposing further proceedings involving the CIT(A) due to time constraints. The judgment provided a comprehensive analysis of the legal issues, guiding the resolution based on applicable laws and precedents.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360601</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>