<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (5) TMI 1155 - ITAT CUTTACK</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360591</link>
    <description>The Tribunal remitted the issues of addition of unsecured creditors, disallowance of purchase of materials, and disallowance of contract expenses back to the Assessing Officer for further verification. The Tribunal reduced the disallowance of contract expenses from 2% to 1% based on audited books and trade practices. Additionally, the Tribunal instructed the Assessing Officer to re-examine the addition of a specific amount for steel purchase supported by bank statements. The Tribunal partly allowed the overall appeal against the CIT(A) order, stressing the importance of providing proper documentation for assessments and appeals. The case was sent back for a fair and thorough assessment process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 May 2018 13:50:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=520951" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (5) TMI 1155 - ITAT CUTTACK</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360591</link>
      <description>The Tribunal remitted the issues of addition of unsecured creditors, disallowance of purchase of materials, and disallowance of contract expenses back to the Assessing Officer for further verification. The Tribunal reduced the disallowance of contract expenses from 2% to 1% based on audited books and trade practices. Additionally, the Tribunal instructed the Assessing Officer to re-examine the addition of a specific amount for steel purchase supported by bank statements. The Tribunal partly allowed the overall appeal against the CIT(A) order, stressing the importance of providing proper documentation for assessments and appeals. The case was sent back for a fair and thorough assessment process.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360591</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>