<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (5) TMI 1146 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360582</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals filed by the appellant-assessees, setting aside the demand for Special Additional Duty (SAD) along with interest and penalty. It concluded that Dadra is not a tax-free area, making the exemption notifications applicable. The Tribunal also dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal for enhancement of penalty under Section 114A of the Customs Act, emphasizing that without a valid demand, the penalty could not be sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 May 2018 08:55:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=520930" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (5) TMI 1146 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360582</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals filed by the appellant-assessees, setting aside the demand for Special Additional Duty (SAD) along with interest and penalty. It concluded that Dadra is not a tax-free area, making the exemption notifications applicable. The Tribunal also dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal for enhancement of penalty under Section 114A of the Customs Act, emphasizing that without a valid demand, the penalty could not be sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360582</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>