<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (5) TMI 1138 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360574</link>
    <description>The appeal was allowed, and the case was remanded to the adjudicating authority for reevaluation. The Tribunal emphasized the necessity of verifying records to determine the accuracy of the demand for cenvat credit, particularly in relation to the payment of service tax and cenvat credit for the export cargo handling service.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Nov 2019 17:55:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=520918" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (5) TMI 1138 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360574</link>
      <description>The appeal was allowed, and the case was remanded to the adjudicating authority for reevaluation. The Tribunal emphasized the necessity of verifying records to determine the accuracy of the demand for cenvat credit, particularly in relation to the payment of service tax and cenvat credit for the export cargo handling service.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360574</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>