<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (5) TMI 1125 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360561</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal by upholding the interest demand and dropping all penalties imposed, citing the provisions of Section 80 and relevant legal precedents. The matter was remanded back to the original authority for quantification of the interest amount.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 May 2018 09:56:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=520902" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (5) TMI 1125 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360561</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal by upholding the interest demand and dropping all penalties imposed, citing the provisions of Section 80 and relevant legal precedents. The matter was remanded back to the original authority for quantification of the interest amount.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360561</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>