<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (5) TMI 1121 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360557</link>
    <description>Manpower recruitment and supply services rendered to overseas customers, with consideration received in convertible foreign exchange, were held not liable to service tax during the gap between withdrawal and reinstatement of the exemption notification, as export of services remained tax free and the demand lacked corroborative evidence. The margin from bulk purchase and resale of air tickets, and commission-linked insurance bookings, was also held outside business auxiliary service because the Revenue failed to establish a taxable service and a mere trading margin did not amount to commission income. The order dropping the service tax demand was sustained and the Revenue&#039;s challenge failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Apr 2019 11:42:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=520897" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (5) TMI 1121 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360557</link>
      <description>Manpower recruitment and supply services rendered to overseas customers, with consideration received in convertible foreign exchange, were held not liable to service tax during the gap between withdrawal and reinstatement of the exemption notification, as export of services remained tax free and the demand lacked corroborative evidence. The margin from bulk purchase and resale of air tickets, and commission-linked insurance bookings, was also held outside business auxiliary service because the Revenue failed to establish a taxable service and a mere trading margin did not amount to commission income. The order dropping the service tax demand was sustained and the Revenue&#039;s challenge failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360557</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>