<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (5) TMI 1115 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360551</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, overturning the denial of the refund claim for irregular CENVAT credit. The appellant&#039;s claim for refund, based on double payment of duty during asset transfer, was initially rejected for lack of proof. However, the Tribunal found clear evidence of excess duty payment in the Order-in-Original, leading to the decision to grant the refund and allow the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2018 11:40:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=520891" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (5) TMI 1115 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360551</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, overturning the denial of the refund claim for irregular CENVAT credit. The appellant&#039;s claim for refund, based on double payment of duty during asset transfer, was initially rejected for lack of proof. However, the Tribunal found clear evidence of excess duty payment in the Order-in-Original, leading to the decision to grant the refund and allow the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360551</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>