https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272814 A shareholder's challenge to a company resolution and resulting share allotment was held not maintainable under Section 42 of the Specific Relief Act because the plaint did not show denial of the plaintiff's legal character or proprietary right. The complaint was directed at others asserting rights in additional company property, which was not enough to establish a denial of the plaintiff's own title. The suit also omitted further relief, such as rectification of the register or consequential injunction, and that omission attracted the statutory bar. The appeal therefore failed. en-us Wed, 17 Feb 1932 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 18 May 2018 17:30:13 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272814 A shareholder's challenge to a company resolution and resulting share allotment was held not maintainable under Section 42 of the Specific Relief Act because the plaint did not show denial of the plaintiff's legal character or proprietary right. The complaint was directed at others asserting rights in additional company property, which was not enough to establish a denial of the plaintiff's own title. The suit also omitted further relief, such as rectification of the register or consequential injunction, and that omission attracted the statutory bar. The appeal therefore failed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 17 Feb 1932 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272814