<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1964 (8) TMI 85 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272804</link>
    <description>An order by the Commissioner under section 34 of the Agricultural Income-tax Act, 1955, that merely declines to interfere with an assessment does not qualify as an order enhancing the assessment or otherwise prejudicial to the assessee. The statutory scheme provides a separate appeal from the original assessment and a further appeal to the Tribunal, while the revisional power under section 34 is limited by the second proviso, which excludes orders refusing interference from the category of prejudicial orders. On that construction, no revision lies under section 54 against such a refusal, because the assessee is not placed in a worse position than under the original order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 1964 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 May 2018 13:17:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=520842" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1964 (8) TMI 85 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272804</link>
      <description>An order by the Commissioner under section 34 of the Agricultural Income-tax Act, 1955, that merely declines to interfere with an assessment does not qualify as an order enhancing the assessment or otherwise prejudicial to the assessee. The statutory scheme provides a separate appeal from the original assessment and a further appeal to the Tribunal, while the revisional power under section 34 is limited by the second proviso, which excludes orders refusing interference from the category of prejudicial orders. On that construction, no revision lies under section 54 against such a refusal, because the assessee is not placed in a worse position than under the original order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 1964 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272804</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>