<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (5) TMI 1087 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360523</link>
    <description>The ITAT ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that the gift of 50% interest in a property to a family member did not constitute a transfer under section 2(47) of the Income Tax Act. The ITAT considered the transaction as part of a family arrangement for acquiring separate properties, not attracting tax liability. Consequently, the ITAT directed the deletion of additions towards capital gain computation, overturning the decisions of the AO and CIT(A).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 May 2018 08:44:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=520801" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (5) TMI 1087 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360523</link>
      <description>The ITAT ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that the gift of 50% interest in a property to a family member did not constitute a transfer under section 2(47) of the Income Tax Act. The ITAT considered the transaction as part of a family arrangement for acquiring separate properties, not attracting tax liability. Consequently, the ITAT directed the deletion of additions towards capital gain computation, overturning the decisions of the AO and CIT(A).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360523</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>