<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (4) TMI 26 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=13070</link>
    <description>The court upheld the constitutional validity of the service tax on services provided by mandap-keepers, ruling that it falls within the legislative competence of the Union of India. The court clarified that the tax is on the service provided by mandap-keepers and not on land or buildings. It also found the definitions and valuation provisions in the Finance Act to be clear and not arbitrary. As a result, all writ petitions challenging the service tax were dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 Feb 2014 18:40:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=52080" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (4) TMI 26 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=13070</link>
      <description>The court upheld the constitutional validity of the service tax on services provided by mandap-keepers, ruling that it falls within the legislative competence of the Union of India. The court clarified that the tax is on the service provided by mandap-keepers and not on land or buildings. It also found the definitions and valuation provisions in the Finance Act to be clear and not arbitrary. As a result, all writ petitions challenging the service tax were dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=13070</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>