<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (5) TMI 1086 - ITAT INDORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360522</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed all 28 appeals, setting aside the penalties imposed under section 271(1)(b) of the Income Tax Act. The decision was based on the consistent application of legal principles regarding penalties in cases where assessments were completed under section 143(3) of the Act, emphasizing the importance of subsequent compliance and the lack of justification for penalties in such scenarios.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 May 2018 08:40:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=520799" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (5) TMI 1086 - ITAT INDORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360522</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed all 28 appeals, setting aside the penalties imposed under section 271(1)(b) of the Income Tax Act. The decision was based on the consistent application of legal principles regarding penalties in cases where assessments were completed under section 143(3) of the Act, emphasizing the importance of subsequent compliance and the lack of justification for penalties in such scenarios.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360522</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>