<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (5) TMI 1082 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360518</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, a private limited company operating a beauty parlour, by directing the Income Tax Officer to delete the addition of Rs. 20,08,334 on account of income not offered to tax. The Tribunal held that the income should be recognized over the agreement period, relying on Accounting Standard-9 and principles of revenue recognition for royalties. The judgment was pronounced on 15.05.2018.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 May 2018 08:30:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=520793" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (5) TMI 1082 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360518</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, a private limited company operating a beauty parlour, by directing the Income Tax Officer to delete the addition of Rs. 20,08,334 on account of income not offered to tax. The Tribunal held that the income should be recognized over the agreement period, relying on Accounting Standard-9 and principles of revenue recognition for royalties. The judgment was pronounced on 15.05.2018.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360518</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>