https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360511 The court upheld the addition of Rs. 3,90,137 in total income under section 68, as partners failed to report agricultural income in their tax returns, resulting in unexplained shortfall. The court also confirmed the disallowance of Rs. 12,330 for telephone and traveling expenses due to potential personal elements. The appeal was dismissed, and the order was issued on 27/03/2018. en-us Tue, 27 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 18 May 2018 08:09:25 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360511 The court upheld the addition of Rs. 3,90,137 in total income under section 68, as partners failed to report agricultural income in their tax returns, resulting in unexplained shortfall. The court also confirmed the disallowance of Rs. 12,330 for telephone and traveling expenses due to potential personal elements. The appeal was dismissed, and the order was issued on 27/03/2018. Case-Laws Income Tax Tue, 27 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360511