<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (5) TMI 1074 - APPELLATE AUTHORITY INSOLVENCY AND BANKRUPTCY BOARD OF INDIA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360510</link>
    <description>The First Appellate Authority (FAA) dismissed the appeal regarding a Right to Information (RTI) request for clarification on experience criteria for Insolvency Professional registration. The FAA held that public authorities are not required to provide advice or opinions but only existing material records. It emphasized that information publicly available may not be subject to RTI requests and that authorities are not obligated to create new records to address specific queries. The decision highlighted the limitations of RTI requests in seeking opinions or advice, reinforcing the focus on existing records or specific information available with the authority.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 May 2018 08:08:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=520783" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (5) TMI 1074 - APPELLATE AUTHORITY INSOLVENCY AND BANKRUPTCY BOARD OF INDIA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360510</link>
      <description>The First Appellate Authority (FAA) dismissed the appeal regarding a Right to Information (RTI) request for clarification on experience criteria for Insolvency Professional registration. The FAA held that public authorities are not required to provide advice or opinions but only existing material records. It emphasized that information publicly available may not be subject to RTI requests and that authorities are not obligated to create new records to address specific queries. The decision highlighted the limitations of RTI requests in seeking opinions or advice, reinforcing the focus on existing records or specific information available with the authority.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360510</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>