<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (5) TMI 1069 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360505</link>
    <description>Old and used colour picture tubes imported without the mandatory permission under the hazardous waste regime were treated as misdeclared goods, because the available examination material and expert opinion showed them to be electronic assemblies subject to the Hazardous Wastes (Management, Handling and Trans-boundary Movement) Rules, 2008. In the absence of any licence, permission, or credible explanation supporting lawful import, the goods were liable to confiscation and re-export. The customs authority&#039;s confiscation, redemption fine and penalty were found to rest on the established nature of the goods and disclosed no material irregularity or arbitrariness, so the consequential measures were sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2018 18:01:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=520777" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (5) TMI 1069 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360505</link>
      <description>Old and used colour picture tubes imported without the mandatory permission under the hazardous waste regime were treated as misdeclared goods, because the available examination material and expert opinion showed them to be electronic assemblies subject to the Hazardous Wastes (Management, Handling and Trans-boundary Movement) Rules, 2008. In the absence of any licence, permission, or credible explanation supporting lawful import, the goods were liable to confiscation and re-export. The customs authority&#039;s confiscation, redemption fine and penalty were found to rest on the established nature of the goods and disclosed no material irregularity or arbitrariness, so the consequential measures were sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360505</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>