<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (5) TMI 1052 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360488</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the demands of MODVAT credit along with interest as the appellant failed to prove the installation and removal of 10 moulds to job-workers post a specified date. However, the interest and penalty imposed were set aside due to the disputed issue dating back over 21 years. The remand proceedings supported the appellant&#039;s position on CENVAT credit for various moulds, leading to the reversal of duty liability on the 10 moulds.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 May 2018 06:48:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=520753" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (5) TMI 1052 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360488</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the demands of MODVAT credit along with interest as the appellant failed to prove the installation and removal of 10 moulds to job-workers post a specified date. However, the interest and penalty imposed were set aside due to the disputed issue dating back over 21 years. The remand proceedings supported the appellant&#039;s position on CENVAT credit for various moulds, leading to the reversal of duty liability on the 10 moulds.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360488</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>