<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (5) TMI 1049 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360485</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, holding that the appellant was eligible to avail CENVAT credit on service tax paid for an insurance policy obtained under the Workmen&#039;s Compensation Scheme. The decision emphasized the direct nexus between the insurance service for workmen&#039;s protection and the manufacturing activities of the appellant. Citing previous rulings, the Tribunal set a precedent for similar cases, establishing that inputs used for employee safety under statutory obligations like workmen&#039;s compensation are eligible for CENVAT credit. The impugned order was deemed unsustainable and set aside, settling the issue in favor of the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 May 2018 19:08:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=520750" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (5) TMI 1049 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360485</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, holding that the appellant was eligible to avail CENVAT credit on service tax paid for an insurance policy obtained under the Workmen&#039;s Compensation Scheme. The decision emphasized the direct nexus between the insurance service for workmen&#039;s protection and the manufacturing activities of the appellant. Citing previous rulings, the Tribunal set a precedent for similar cases, establishing that inputs used for employee safety under statutory obligations like workmen&#039;s compensation are eligible for CENVAT credit. The impugned order was deemed unsustainable and set aside, settling the issue in favor of the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360485</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>