<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (5) TMI 1038 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360474</link>
    <description>Tax credit on raw materials used in manufacture was not reducible under section 11(3)(b) of the Gujarat VAT Act merely because the materials were sent to the assessee&#039;s own out-of-State unit for processing and the finished goods were later brought back for sale. Clause (b) was confined to the specific branch-transfer or consignment situations expressly mentioned, so the reduction provision did not apply and the assessee&#039;s claim succeeded on merits. In the connected matter, the Tribunal was said to have been dealing with an appeal dismissed for non-compliance with predeposit, but no remand was made in the peculiar facts because the tax-credit issue had already been settled in the assessee&#039;s favour.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 May 2018 06:01:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=520736" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (5) TMI 1038 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360474</link>
      <description>Tax credit on raw materials used in manufacture was not reducible under section 11(3)(b) of the Gujarat VAT Act merely because the materials were sent to the assessee&#039;s own out-of-State unit for processing and the finished goods were later brought back for sale. Clause (b) was confined to the specific branch-transfer or consignment situations expressly mentioned, so the reduction provision did not apply and the assessee&#039;s claim succeeded on merits. In the connected matter, the Tribunal was said to have been dealing with an appeal dismissed for non-compliance with predeposit, but no remand was made in the peculiar facts because the tax-credit issue had already been settled in the assessee&#039;s favour.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360474</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>