<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (5) TMI 1439 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272790</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found the penalty proceedings invalid due to ambiguity in the initiation and levy of penalties under section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act. The Assessing Officer&#039;s failure to clearly identify the specific violation and record satisfaction led to the penalties being deleted. The Tribunal stressed the importance of precise charges and adherence to natural justice principles in penalty imposition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sun, 15 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 May 2018 05:57:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=520731" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (5) TMI 1439 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272790</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found the penalty proceedings invalid due to ambiguity in the initiation and levy of penalties under section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act. The Assessing Officer&#039;s failure to clearly identify the specific violation and record satisfaction led to the penalties being deleted. The Tribunal stressed the importance of precise charges and adherence to natural justice principles in penalty imposition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sun, 15 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272790</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>