<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (1) TMI 1325 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272797</link>
    <description>Cenvat credit on outward freight for transport of goods from the factory gate to customers&#039; premises was held admissible where the service was actually received, service tax had been paid, and the applicable definition of input service covered clearance of final products from the place of removal. On the facts, the factory gate was treated as the place of removal, so the transportation formed part of the eligible input service chain. The belated taking of credit was treated as a procedural lapse caused by delayed accounting entry and did not justify denial of the substantive credit benefit. The denial of credit was therefore unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 May 2018 05:57:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=520724" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (1) TMI 1325 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272797</link>
      <description>Cenvat credit on outward freight for transport of goods from the factory gate to customers&#039; premises was held admissible where the service was actually received, service tax had been paid, and the applicable definition of input service covered clearance of final products from the place of removal. On the facts, the factory gate was treated as the place of removal, so the transportation formed part of the eligible input service chain. The belated taking of credit was treated as a procedural lapse caused by delayed accounting entry and did not justify denial of the substantive credit benefit. The denial of credit was therefore unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272797</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>