<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (5) TMI 1036 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360472</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the assessment under Section 153C of the IT Act was void ab initio due to the lack of recorded satisfaction by the Assessing Officer, thereby quashing the proceedings. Consequently, the additional grounds of appeal regarding the addition towards gain on sale of agricultural lands, duplication of sale consideration receipts, payment to other landowners, and estimation of income were not separately addressed, and the assessments for the relevant years were quashed based on this jurisdictional issue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 May 2018 05:57:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=520721" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (5) TMI 1036 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360472</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the assessment under Section 153C of the IT Act was void ab initio due to the lack of recorded satisfaction by the Assessing Officer, thereby quashing the proceedings. Consequently, the additional grounds of appeal regarding the addition towards gain on sale of agricultural lands, duplication of sale consideration receipts, payment to other landowners, and estimation of income were not separately addressed, and the assessments for the relevant years were quashed based on this jurisdictional issue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360472</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>