https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272785 The Privy Council partially allowed the appeal, overturning the High Court's decision. It found that there was indeed a partnership between the parties in a money-lending and banking business. The deceased partner was confirmed to have had a specific share in the business since May 1908. The legal representatives of the deceased partner were held liable for the partnership obligations until the suit was filed in April 1924. However, the claim against the family members of the deceased partner for benefiting from the partnership was dismissed due to insufficient evidence. The Privy Council made declarations on the partnership agreement, dissolution, and liability, with costs allocated accordingly. en-us Thu, 21 Jun 1934 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 17 May 2018 17:07:53 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272785 The Privy Council partially allowed the appeal, overturning the High Court's decision. It found that there was indeed a partnership between the parties in a money-lending and banking business. The deceased partner was confirmed to have had a specific share in the business since May 1908. The legal representatives of the deceased partner were held liable for the partnership obligations until the suit was filed in April 1924. However, the claim against the family members of the deceased partner for benefiting from the partnership was dismissed due to insufficient evidence. The Privy Council made declarations on the partnership agreement, dissolution, and liability, with costs allocated accordingly. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 21 Jun 1934 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272785