<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1964 (12) TMI 68 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272780</link>
    <description>A partnership preceded by gifts to two daughters through book entries can be recognised as genuine where the gifts are real and effective and the partnership deed contemporaneously acknowledges the daughters&#039; capital. The use of book entries does not by itself invalidate a gift; their sufficiency depends on the subject-matter and surrounding conduct. Registration of the firm, notice to banks, and the executed deed supported genuineness, and the daughters&#039; lack of active management did not defeat the partnership because a partner may contribute capital without participating in administration. The assessee-firm was therefore entitled to registration under section 26A, and refusal to register was unjustified.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 1964 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 May 2018 15:48:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=520693" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1964 (12) TMI 68 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272780</link>
      <description>A partnership preceded by gifts to two daughters through book entries can be recognised as genuine where the gifts are real and effective and the partnership deed contemporaneously acknowledges the daughters&#039; capital. The use of book entries does not by itself invalidate a gift; their sufficiency depends on the subject-matter and surrounding conduct. Registration of the firm, notice to banks, and the executed deed supported genuineness, and the daughters&#039; lack of active management did not defeat the partnership because a partner may contribute capital without participating in administration. The assessee-firm was therefore entitled to registration under section 26A, and refusal to register was unjustified.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 1964 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272780</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>