<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (7) TMI 52 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=13059</link>
    <description>The court held that deductions for stamp duty and registration charges from the &quot;apparent consideration&quot; under section 269UA(b) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 were impermissible. The petitioner was awarded the unlawfully deducted amount of Rs.24,97,550 with interest at 12% per annum from February 24, 1989. The impugned orders were set aside, and the respondents were directed to pay the petitioner within 60 days. The petition was allowed with no order as to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 16 Jul 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 11:52:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=52069" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (7) TMI 52 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=13059</link>
      <description>The court held that deductions for stamp duty and registration charges from the &quot;apparent consideration&quot; under section 269UA(b) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 were impermissible. The petitioner was awarded the unlawfully deducted amount of Rs.24,97,550 with interest at 12% per annum from February 24, 1989. The impugned orders were set aside, and the respondents were directed to pay the petitioner within 60 days. The petition was allowed with no order as to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Jul 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=13059</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>