https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272778 The High Court ruled against the Department, favoring the assessee in a case concerning the validity of serving notice on the son of a partner of a firm. The Court held that such service was invalid as it did not comply with Rule 77, which does not extend the provision for service on a family member to a firm. The Court awarded costs of Rs. 200 to the assessee. en-us Sat, 02 Sep 1978 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 17 May 2018 15:26:52 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272778 The High Court ruled against the Department, favoring the assessee in a case concerning the validity of serving notice on the son of a partner of a firm. The Court held that such service was invalid as it did not comply with Rule 77, which does not extend the provision for service on a family member to a firm. The Court awarded costs of Rs. 200 to the assessee. Case-Laws Indian Laws Sat, 02 Sep 1978 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272778