https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360466 The High Court examined a case involving the validity of a seizure order and penalty under Section 129(3) related to E-way bill compliance for inter-state transactions. The petitioner, an Iron and Steel goods firm, challenged the seizure order issued due to E-way bill non-accompaniment. Despite later generating the E-way bill, the court found malice intent in the timing of the orders and ruled in favor of the petitioner. The court emphasized the importance of proper documentation and timing, quashing the seizure and penalty orders and directing immediate release of the goods and vehicle to the petitioner. en-us Wed, 09 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 26 Feb 2025 11:25:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360466 The High Court examined a case involving the validity of a seizure order and penalty under Section 129(3) related to E-way bill compliance for inter-state transactions. The petitioner, an Iron and Steel goods firm, challenged the seizure order issued due to E-way bill non-accompaniment. Despite later generating the E-way bill, the court found malice intent in the timing of the orders and ruled in favor of the petitioner. The court emphasized the importance of proper documentation and timing, quashing the seizure and penalty orders and directing immediate release of the goods and vehicle to the petitioner. Case-Laws GST Wed, 09 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360466