<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (5) TMI 1012 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360448</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions on all grounds, dismissing the revenue&#039;s appeal. The deletion of the addition for undisclosed investment was justified as the funds were traceable, no violation of Rule 46A occurred, the exemption of the principal sum in mutual funds was allowed, and assessment below the returned income with a refund was deemed valid. The order was pronounced on 14.05.2018.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 May 2018 05:55:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=520623" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (5) TMI 1012 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360448</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions on all grounds, dismissing the revenue&#039;s appeal. The deletion of the addition for undisclosed investment was justified as the funds were traceable, no violation of Rule 46A occurred, the exemption of the principal sum in mutual funds was allowed, and assessment below the returned income with a refund was deemed valid. The order was pronounced on 14.05.2018.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360448</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>