<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (5) TMI 1008 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360444</link>
    <description>The Tribunal determined that the jurisdiction for hearing the appeals lies with the bench having jurisdiction over the current Assessing Officer, which in this case is the Delhi benches. The Tribunal also extended the stay on the collection/recovery of the outstanding tax demands until the stay applications are disposed of, ensuring no coercive measures are taken in the meantime. The matter was referred to the Hon&#039;ble President for final determination of jurisdiction.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 May 2018 05:55:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=520619" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (5) TMI 1008 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360444</link>
      <description>The Tribunal determined that the jurisdiction for hearing the appeals lies with the bench having jurisdiction over the current Assessing Officer, which in this case is the Delhi benches. The Tribunal also extended the stay on the collection/recovery of the outstanding tax demands until the stay applications are disposed of, ensuring no coercive measures are taken in the meantime. The matter was referred to the Hon&#039;ble President for final determination of jurisdiction.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360444</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>