<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (5) TMI 1004 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360440</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeals, condoning the delay in filing due to valid reasons and addressing the addition of unexplained cash credit u/s 68 of the Income-tax Act. It emphasized accurate income disclosure and directed the Assessing Officer to assess income based on legitimate sources like official salary, professional income, and bank interest, eliminating discrepancies in disclosed additional incomes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 May 2018 05:55:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=520615" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (5) TMI 1004 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360440</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeals, condoning the delay in filing due to valid reasons and addressing the addition of unexplained cash credit u/s 68 of the Income-tax Act. It emphasized accurate income disclosure and directed the Assessing Officer to assess income based on legitimate sources like official salary, professional income, and bank interest, eliminating discrepancies in disclosed additional incomes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360440</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>