<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (5) TMI 1002 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360438</link>
    <description>The Revenue&#039;s appeal for A.Y. 2010-11 was allowed, as rental income and service fee received from M/s. Reliance Industries Ltd. were not considered eligible for the mutuality principle. In A.Y. 2011-12, the assessee&#039;s appeal was dismissed, with interest income categorized as &quot;income from other sources&quot; and rental income/service fee treated as per the Revenue&#039;s arguments from the previous year. The judgment emphasized the specific facts and legal principles governing the transactions between the parties.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 May 2018 17:24:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=520613" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (5) TMI 1002 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360438</link>
      <description>The Revenue&#039;s appeal for A.Y. 2010-11 was allowed, as rental income and service fee received from M/s. Reliance Industries Ltd. were not considered eligible for the mutuality principle. In A.Y. 2011-12, the assessee&#039;s appeal was dismissed, with interest income categorized as &quot;income from other sources&quot; and rental income/service fee treated as per the Revenue&#039;s arguments from the previous year. The judgment emphasized the specific facts and legal principles governing the transactions between the parties.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360438</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>