<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (5) TMI 985 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360421</link>
    <description>The appeal challenging the taxability of design services under section 65(105)(zzzzd) of the Finance Act, 1994 for the period from 1st June 2007 to 30th September 2011 was successful. The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT MUMBAI set aside the impugned order, allowing the appeals. The decision was based on the distinction between goods and services for taxation purposes, supported by legal precedents and references to relevant case law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2019 13:03:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=520596" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (5) TMI 985 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360421</link>
      <description>The appeal challenging the taxability of design services under section 65(105)(zzzzd) of the Finance Act, 1994 for the period from 1st June 2007 to 30th September 2011 was successful. The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT MUMBAI set aside the impugned order, allowing the appeals. The decision was based on the distinction between goods and services for taxation purposes, supported by legal precedents and references to relevant case law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360421</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>