https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360418 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, determining that their service did not fall under advertising service for service tax liability. The Tribunal found that the appellant's activity of collecting and forwarding advertisements did not meet the criteria of an advertising agency as defined by the Finance Act. As the facts were similar to a previous case where a favorable decision was made, the Tribunal set aside the impugned order, allowing the appeal and granting relief to the appellants. en-us Wed, 25 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 17 May 2018 05:53:54 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360418 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, determining that their service did not fall under advertising service for service tax liability. The Tribunal found that the appellant's activity of collecting and forwarding advertisements did not meet the criteria of an advertising agency as defined by the Finance Act. As the facts were similar to a previous case where a favorable decision was made, the Tribunal set aside the impugned order, allowing the appeal and granting relief to the appellants. Case-Laws Service Tax Wed, 25 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360418