<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (5) TMI 966 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360402</link>
    <description>The Tribunal overturned the denial of CENVAT credit on graphite bush, racks, and table stand, ruling in favor of the appellant. It found these items qualified as capital goods under relevant definitions and were essential for the manufacturing process, aligning with precedents such as Geltec Pvt. Ltd. and Banco Products (India) Ltd. The Tribunal set aside the initial order, allowing the appeal and granting the appellant relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 May 2018 05:52:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=520577" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (5) TMI 966 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360402</link>
      <description>The Tribunal overturned the denial of CENVAT credit on graphite bush, racks, and table stand, ruling in favor of the appellant. It found these items qualified as capital goods under relevant definitions and were essential for the manufacturing process, aligning with precedents such as Geltec Pvt. Ltd. and Banco Products (India) Ltd. The Tribunal set aside the initial order, allowing the appeal and granting the appellant relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360402</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>