https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272748 Under the town planning statute, the Government's power to call for a draft scheme was treated as a continuing power, so extension of time for submission was valid and the last extended date governed valuation for betterment contribution. The statute also permitted variation of a sanctioned scheme, allowing the period for making contribution claims to be enlarged. The scheme-based increase in land value was treated as attributable to the planned development and therefore liable to betterment contribution as statutory unearned increment. A statutory appellate authority acting as persona designata had no inherent power to remand unless expressly conferred, so the remand order was beyond jurisdiction and was set aside. en-us Sat, 17 Feb 1973 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 16 May 2018 15:53:08 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272748 Under the town planning statute, the Government's power to call for a draft scheme was treated as a continuing power, so extension of time for submission was valid and the last extended date governed valuation for betterment contribution. The statute also permitted variation of a sanctioned scheme, allowing the period for making contribution claims to be enlarged. The scheme-based increase in land value was treated as attributable to the planned development and therefore liable to betterment contribution as statutory unearned increment. A statutory appellate authority acting as persona designata had no inherent power to remand unless expressly conferred, so the remand order was beyond jurisdiction and was set aside. Case-Laws Indian Laws Sat, 17 Feb 1973 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272748