<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (2) TMI 36 - GAUHATI High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=13038</link>
    <description>The dominant issue was whether statutory dues paid after the end of the accounting year but before the due date for filing the return are allowable under Explanation 2 to s. 43B of the Income-tax Act, 1961. Relying on its binding precedent, the HC held that such payments, including contributions to provident fund and similar dues, qualify for deduction because Explanation 2 (inserted retrospectively from 01.04.1984) permits allowance where payment is made before the return-filing due date. Since the assessee had admittedly paid the relevant amounts before filing the return, the HC found no substantial question of law and dismissed the appeal in limine.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 Feb 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2026 21:02:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=52048" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (2) TMI 36 - GAUHATI High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=13038</link>
      <description>The dominant issue was whether statutory dues paid after the end of the accounting year but before the due date for filing the return are allowable under Explanation 2 to s. 43B of the Income-tax Act, 1961. Relying on its binding precedent, the HC held that such payments, including contributions to provident fund and similar dues, qualify for deduction because Explanation 2 (inserted retrospectively from 01.04.1984) permits allowance where payment is made before the return-filing due date. Since the assessee had admittedly paid the relevant amounts before filing the return, the HC found no substantial question of law and dismissed the appeal in limine.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Feb 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=13038</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>