<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1994 (1) TMI 301 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272745</link>
    <description>Leave encashment for a High Court Judge under the statutory leave scheme was confined to allowances expressly permitted by the governing rules, so sumptuary allowance, compensatory allowance and office-linked benefits such as residence and staff-car facilities were excluded from the cash equivalent of leave salary. The Court also upheld compensation for failure to provide a staff car, treating the statutory entitlement to the car as distinct from the petrol allowance and not replaceable by an executive payment. Interest on delayed gratuity and allied dues was sustained because a legally due amount paid late can attract reasonable interest for the period of delay.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Jan 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 May 2018 11:59:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=520473" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1994 (1) TMI 301 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272745</link>
      <description>Leave encashment for a High Court Judge under the statutory leave scheme was confined to allowances expressly permitted by the governing rules, so sumptuary allowance, compensatory allowance and office-linked benefits such as residence and staff-car facilities were excluded from the cash equivalent of leave salary. The Court also upheld compensation for failure to provide a staff car, treating the statutory entitlement to the car as distinct from the petrol allowance and not replaceable by an executive payment. Interest on delayed gratuity and allied dues was sustained because a legally due amount paid late can attract reasonable interest for the period of delay.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Jan 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272745</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>