<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (5) TMI 960 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360396</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the ITAT&#039;s decision to set aside penalties imposed under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for assessment years 2002-03 to 2007-08. The court found that the vague show-cause notices did not meet legal requirements, emphasizing the necessity of clear charges against the assessee. Citing legal precedents, the court concluded that the penalties were not sustainable due to the lack of specificity in the notices. As a result, the appeals against the penalties were dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 May 2018 06:45:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=520417" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (5) TMI 960 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360396</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the ITAT&#039;s decision to set aside penalties imposed under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for assessment years 2002-03 to 2007-08. The court found that the vague show-cause notices did not meet legal requirements, emphasizing the necessity of clear charges against the assessee. Citing legal precedents, the court concluded that the penalties were not sustainable due to the lack of specificity in the notices. As a result, the appeals against the penalties were dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360396</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>