<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (5) TMI 911 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360347</link>
    <description>Rule 6(1) of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2002 and 2004 applies to fuel used as a common input for both dutiable and exempted goods. The Tribunal noted that the Supreme Court had already settled that the prohibition covers all inputs, including fuel, and that the exclusion of fuel from the separate-accounting mechanism in Rule 6(2) does not confer a right to credit where the fuel is used to manufacture exempted goods. Accordingly, CENVAT credit attributable to exempt clearances was not admissible, and the demand was sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 May 2018 06:42:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=520368" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (5) TMI 911 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360347</link>
      <description>Rule 6(1) of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2002 and 2004 applies to fuel used as a common input for both dutiable and exempted goods. The Tribunal noted that the Supreme Court had already settled that the prohibition covers all inputs, including fuel, and that the exclusion of fuel from the separate-accounting mechanism in Rule 6(2) does not confer a right to credit where the fuel is used to manufacture exempted goods. Accordingly, CENVAT credit attributable to exempt clearances was not admissible, and the demand was sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360347</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>