<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (7) TMI 1280 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272735</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)&#039;s order and directed the Assessing Officer to calculate the deduction under section 36(1)(viia) based on the aggregate monthly average advances made by rural bank branches, as per Rule 6ABA. The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes, with the order pronounced on July 8, 2015.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 May 2018 06:42:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=520363" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (7) TMI 1280 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272735</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)&#039;s order and directed the Assessing Officer to calculate the deduction under section 36(1)(viia) based on the aggregate monthly average advances made by rural bank branches, as per Rule 6ABA. The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes, with the order pronounced on July 8, 2015.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272735</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>