https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272740 The appellant was convicted for rape and murder under Sections 376 and 302 IPC, receiving 10 years for rape and life imprisonment for murder. The High Court upheld the conviction and sentencing, but the appeal challenged the decision. The case relied on circumstantial evidence, including witness testimonies and forensic findings linking the appellant to the crimes. Despite confirming the conviction, the court considered the appellant's age, determining him to be a juvenile at the time of the offense. Consequently, the sentence was set aside, and the appellant was ordered to be released unless needed for another case. en-us Thu, 08 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 16 May 2018 06:42:21 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272740 The appellant was convicted for rape and murder under Sections 376 and 302 IPC, receiving 10 years for rape and life imprisonment for murder. The High Court upheld the conviction and sentencing, but the appeal challenged the decision. The case relied on circumstantial evidence, including witness testimonies and forensic findings linking the appellant to the crimes. Despite confirming the conviction, the court considered the appellant's age, determining him to be a juvenile at the time of the offense. Consequently, the sentence was set aside, and the appellant was ordered to be released unless needed for another case. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 08 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272740