<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (9) TMI 1648 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272741</link>
    <description>The tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant on various issues, including the adjustment to Arm&#039;s Length Price (ALP) for international transactions, allowing depreciation on Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) without government recognition, permitting depreciation on Goodwill, directing verification and allowance of TDS credit, recognizing provision for warranty as an ascertained liability, allowing provision for obsolescence of inventory as a business loss under normal provisions, and permitting provision for interest on delayed payments under the MSMED Act without adding back while computing book profits under Section 115JB. The tribunal emphasized adherence to regulatory guidelines and judicial precedents in its decisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 May 2018 14:41:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=520357" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (9) TMI 1648 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272741</link>
      <description>The tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant on various issues, including the adjustment to Arm&#039;s Length Price (ALP) for international transactions, allowing depreciation on Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) without government recognition, permitting depreciation on Goodwill, directing verification and allowance of TDS credit, recognizing provision for warranty as an ascertained liability, allowing provision for obsolescence of inventory as a business loss under normal provisions, and permitting provision for interest on delayed payments under the MSMED Act without adding back while computing book profits under Section 115JB. The tribunal emphasized adherence to regulatory guidelines and judicial precedents in its decisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272741</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>