https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272734 Under the Delhi Rent Control Act, an eviction petition based on bona fide residential need must specifically plead all statutory ingredients, including that the landlord has no other reasonably suitable residential accommodation; a bare plea of need is insufficient and evidence cannot cure the omission. The petition was therefore not maintainable on that ground. On parting with possession under section 14(1)(b), mere exclusive occupation by the tenant's brother does not by itself establish subletting or divestment of legal possession; the record showed only physical occupation, not surrender of the tenant's legal right. The eviction decree was set aside and the eviction application dismissed. en-us Wed, 21 Apr 1976 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 15 May 2018 18:14:49 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272734 Under the Delhi Rent Control Act, an eviction petition based on bona fide residential need must specifically plead all statutory ingredients, including that the landlord has no other reasonably suitable residential accommodation; a bare plea of need is insufficient and evidence cannot cure the omission. The petition was therefore not maintainable on that ground. On parting with possession under section 14(1)(b), mere exclusive occupation by the tenant's brother does not by itself establish subletting or divestment of legal possession; the record showed only physical occupation, not surrender of the tenant's legal right. The eviction decree was set aside and the eviction application dismissed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 21 Apr 1976 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272734