<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (9) TMI 684 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272726</link>
    <description>An order refusing leave to defend, or granting conditional leave in a summary suit where non-compliance leads to an immediate decree, affects a defendant&#039;s valuable right and was treated as a judgment appealable under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent. On the facts, the security condition was upheld because the defence did not disclose a bona fide dispute; the record showed separate accounts, admissions of liability, and no convincing basis to treat third-party payments as extinguishing the claim. The commentary also notes that the issue was left for consideration by a larger Bench in view of conflicting authorities.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 May 2018 12:46:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=520258" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (9) TMI 684 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272726</link>
      <description>An order refusing leave to defend, or granting conditional leave in a summary suit where non-compliance leads to an immediate decree, affects a defendant&#039;s valuable right and was treated as a judgment appealable under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent. On the facts, the security condition was upheld because the defence did not disclose a bona fide dispute; the record showed separate accounts, admissions of liability, and no convincing basis to treat third-party payments as extinguishing the claim. The commentary also notes that the issue was left for consideration by a larger Bench in view of conflicting authorities.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272726</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>