https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272722 An election petition alleging corrupt practice under Section 123(5) was not defeated by omission of the precise contract of hiring where it set out sufficient material facts about use of a vehicle to convey voters and showed no material prejudice; the defect was treated as procedural and capable of being cured by particulars or amendment. On the evidence accepted by the High Court, a tractor bearing symbols and flags associated with the appellant was used to transport voters, and the court upheld the finding that it had been hired for that purpose. The declaration voiding the election was therefore sustained. en-us Tue, 23 Feb 1960 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 15 May 2018 11:54:20 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272722 An election petition alleging corrupt practice under Section 123(5) was not defeated by omission of the precise contract of hiring where it set out sufficient material facts about use of a vehicle to convey voters and showed no material prejudice; the defect was treated as procedural and capable of being cured by particulars or amendment. On the evidence accepted by the High Court, a tractor bearing symbols and flags associated with the appellant was used to transport voters, and the court upheld the finding that it had been hired for that purpose. The declaration voiding the election was therefore sustained. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 23 Feb 1960 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272722