<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (5) TMI 879 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360315</link>
    <description>The Tribunal condoned the delay in filing the appeal, allowing it to be taken on record. It held that service tax on renting of immovable property was not applicable for an extended period and that the appellant, a local authority, did not have a mala fide intention to evade payment. The Tribunal set aside the penalty imposed and remanded the case for requantification by the adjudicating authority, considering the appellant&#039;s willingness to pay within the normal time limit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 May 2018 07:13:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=520207" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (5) TMI 879 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360315</link>
      <description>The Tribunal condoned the delay in filing the appeal, allowing it to be taken on record. It held that service tax on renting of immovable property was not applicable for an extended period and that the appellant, a local authority, did not have a mala fide intention to evade payment. The Tribunal set aside the penalty imposed and remanded the case for requantification by the adjudicating authority, considering the appellant&#039;s willingness to pay within the normal time limit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360315</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>