<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (5) TMI 870 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360306</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the penalty imposed under Rule 15(1) of CENVAT Credit Rules 2004, ruling in favor of the appellant. The appeal was allowed on this ground, while the demand confirmation along with interest was upheld. The decision was made on 25.04.2018.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 May 2018 07:12:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=520198" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (5) TMI 870 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360306</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the penalty imposed under Rule 15(1) of CENVAT Credit Rules 2004, ruling in favor of the appellant. The appeal was allowed on this ground, while the demand confirmation along with interest was upheld. The decision was made on 25.04.2018.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360306</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>